law office of scott pactor attorney criminal defense

Presentation Outline from Criminal Defense Bar Association Meeting of 11/30/05
Home | About the Firm | Lawyer Profiles | Areas of Concentration | The Links | Contact Us | Articles and FAQ's | San Diego Criminal Defense Headlines | Community Involvement

I gave this presentation for the Criminal Defense Bar Association.  Look for more materials related to discovery in the New Year!

P R E S E N T A T I O N  O U T L I N E

Scottpactor@yahoo.com

 

I.            PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS

 

A.                What is the Universe of documents?

i.                     Standard (10s-100s)

ii.                   Large(1000s)

iii.                  Gigantic(1000000s)

B.                 What is your Money situation?

i.                     Appointed- state(PCC): “Just Ask Pat”, Trial Director.

ii.                   Appointed- Federal(CJA): Ex Parte Requests, each judge is different, that guy in Colorado

iii.                  Retained:  MAKE SURE YOU INCUDE COSTS N YOUR FEE QUOTE!

C.                Manpower

i.                     You

ii.                   Secretary

iii.                  Intern/Clerk/Paralegal/Investigator/Interpreter: 

iv.                 Second Attorney

D.            Co Counsel Cooperation, lack of cooperation

II.            SPECIFIC EXAMPLES

A.                WIRETAPS

i.                     State v. Federal: DA v. AUSA, , State Judge v. Fed. Judge. Multi jurisdictional, multi investigating agency, multi prosecuting agency:  Damien Mosler, major narcotics(SDDA);  AUSA land: Alana Wong(?),  JUDGE unit,  DEA, BNE. ICE

ii.                   Line sheets: Spanish line sheets, protective orders, audio files.

iii.                  Indexing:  Word Processor, Microsoft Access, Trial Director, Summation???

B.                 STING OPERATIONS

i.                     Confidential Informants:  NAMBLA prosecution in Fed. Court

ii.                   Outrageous Government Misconduct

C.                WHITE COLLAR CRIME

i.                     Discovery on hard drive

ii.                   Third Party Discovery: SEC, outside investigation, deposition testimony!

iii.                  Significance of  “Open File” Method: Brady obligation

III.       WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT REVIEWING DISCOVERY?

 

A.                Potential for IAC

B.                 Great for Client Control!

C.                Delay can be useful.

D.                FREE MONEY!

E.                 Sometimes it actually leads to dismissal, better offers, etc.

complex discovery, state v. federal. gigantic case, wire tap

criminal defense san diego attorney misdemeanor felony federal state appeal d.u.i. domestic violence drugs wire tap conspiracy


The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.